Logical norms as defeasible obligations: disentangling sound and feasible inferences

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Defeasible Calculus for Zetetic Agents.Jared A. Millson - 2021 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 30 (1):3-37.
Feasible inferences.Christopher Cherniak - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (2):248-268.
Is Formal Logic a Science About Rational Arguments?Svatopluk Nevrkla - 2011 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 18 (4):499-511.
Contrary-to-duty obligations.Henry Prakken & Marek Sergot - 1996 - Studia Logica 57 (1):91 - 115.
Deontic Logic with Defeasible Detachment.Xiaochang Yu - 1995 - Dissertation, University of Georgia

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-10

Downloads
23 (#670,971)

6 months
23 (#117,206)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Matteo De Benedetto
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Alessandra Marra
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Inquiry.Robert Stalnaker - 1984 - Synthese 79 (1):171-189.
Change in View: Principles of Reasoning.Gilbert Harman - 1986 - Studia Logica 48 (2):260-261.
Three Ways in Which Logic Might Be Normative.Florian Steinberger - 2019 - Journal of Philosophy 116 (1):5-31.

View all 31 references / Add more references