Contrary-to-duty obligations

Studia Logica 57 (1):91 - 115 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX


We investigate under what conditions contrary-to-duty (CTD) structures lacking temporal and action elements can be given a coherent reading. We argue, contrary to some recent proposals, that CTD is not an instance of defeasible reasoning, and that methods of nonmonotonic logics are inadequate since they are unable to distinguish between defeasibility and violation of primary obligations. We propose a semantic framework based on the idea that primary and CTD obligations are obligations of different kinds: a CTD obligation pertains to, or pre-supposes, a certain context in which a primary obligation is already violated. This framework is presented initially as an extension of Standard Deontic Logic (SDL), a normal modal logic of type KD, and is illustrated by application to a series of examples. The concluding section is concerned with some resemblances between CTD and defeasible reasoning. We show first that the SDL-based framework contains a flaw and must be adjusted. A discussion of possible adjustments, including an alternative treatment in terms of a preference-based semantics, reveals difficulties that are reminiscent of problems in defeasible reasoning and intensional accounts of defeasible conditionals.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 78,094

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Defeasible reasoning and logic programming.Timothy R. Colburn - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (4):417-436.
A logic of comparative obligation.Mark A. Brown - 1996 - Studia Logica 57 (1):117 - 137.
The epistemic basis of defeasible reasoning.Robert L. Causey - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (4):437-458.
A theory of hierarchical consequence and conditionals.Dov M. Gabbay & Karl Schlechta - 2010 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 19 (1):3-32.
Parental Obligation.Nellie Wieland - 2011 - Utilitas 23 (3):249-267.
Abstract argumentation.Robert A. Kowalski & Francesca Toni - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):275-296.


Added to PP

106 (#123,022)

6 months
1 (#489,169)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Deontic logic.Paul McNamara - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Dynamic Thoughts on Ifs and Oughts.Malte Willer - 2014 - Philosophers' Imprint 14:1-30.
Shifting Priorities: Simple Representations for Twenty-seven Iterated Theory Change Operators.Hans Rott - 2006 - In David Makinson, Jacek Malinowski & Heinrich Wansing (eds.), Towards Mathematical Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 269–296.

View all 48 citations / Add more citations