Journal of Business Ethics 85 (2):387 - 398 (2009)
AbstractCompany support for employee volunteerism (CSEV) benefits companies, employees, and society while helping companies meet the expectations of corporate social responsibility (CSR). A nationally representative telephone survey of 990 Canadian companies examined CSEV through the lens of Porter and Kramer's (2006, 'Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility', Harvard Business Review, 78-92.) CSR model. The results demonstrated that Canadian companies passively support employee volunteerism in a variety of ways, such as allowing employees to take time off without pay (71%) or adjusting their work schedules (78%). These Responsive CSR efforts contribute to the company's value chain by enhancing employee morale, a perceived CSEV benefit. More active forms of support requiring company time or money are less common; for example, 29% allow time off with pay. Companies perceive that support for employee volunteering enhances their public image, a Responsive CSR strategy when employed to ameliorate a damaged reputation or a Strategic CSR strategy when contributing to a competitive position. A minority perceive challenges like covering the workload. Many companies target and/or exclude particular causes and link CSEV efforts with other philanthropic donations, suggesting a Strategic CSR application of CSEV. Where programs exist, they frequently are neither tracked nor evaluated, suggesting that companies are not using these programs as strategically as they might
Similar books and articles
Roadmapping Corporate Social Responsibility in Finnish Companies.Virgilio M. Panapanaan, Lassi Linnanen, Minna-Maari Karvonen & Vinh Tho Phan - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2/3):133 - 148.
Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee–Company Identification.Hae-Ryong Kim, Moonkyu Lee, Hyoung-Tark Lee & Na-Min Kim - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 95 (4):557 - 569.
CSR and the SEC: Totally Certifiable!Linda C. Rodríguez & Jane Lemaster - 2009 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:47-54.
Nutrition for Kids Was Good for the Company: Lesson From JAPFA4Kids Nutrition Campaign.M. Gunawan Alif & Retno Artsanti - 2009 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 4:349-366.
Strategy Development: Conceptual Framework on Corporate Social Responsibility.Thomas Hanke & Wolfgang Stark - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 85 (S3):507 - 516.
The Influence of Internal and External Codes on CSR Practice: The Case of Companies Operating in Serbia. [REVIEW]Ivana S. Mijatovic & Dusan Stokic - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 94 (4):533 - 552.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Finding the Ethics of “Red Capitalists”: Political Connection and Philanthropy of Chinese Private Entrepreneurs.Yuan Yang & Min Tang - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 161 (1):133-147.
Battling the Devolution in the Research on Corporate Philanthropy.Kellie Liket & Ana Simaens - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 126 (2):1-24.
Corporate Social Responsibility as an Organizational Attractiveness for Prospective Public Relations Practitioners.Soo-Yeon Kim & Hyojung Park - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 103 (4):639-653.
Corporate-Sponsored Volunteering: A Work Design Perspective. [REVIEW]Karl Pajo & Louise Lee - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 99 (3):467 - 482.
A Text Mining-Based Review of Cause-Related Marketing Literature.João Guerreiro, Paulo Rita & Duarte Trigueiros - 2016 - Journal of Business Ethics 139 (1):111-128.
References found in this work
Intra-Organizational Volunteerism: Good Soldiers, Good Deeds and Good Politics.John Peloza & Derek N. Hassay - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 64 (4):357-379.
Recruitment Strategies for Encouraging Participation in Corporate Volunteer Programs.Dane K. Peterson - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 49 (4):371-386.