Shared Inequity: An Alternative Frame for Racial Justice in Employment

Journal of Business Ethics:1-14 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Racial injustice in employment demands the attention of business organizations because it profoundly shapes our life prospects. While comparing the ideal of perfectly equal opportunity with its invariably imperfect alternatives can impede reform, the true challenge lies in addressing persistent inequities as we strive for equality. This article introduces “shared inequity” as a frame of reference for assessing workplace racial disparities and emphasizing a collective responsibility to remedy systemic issues. In critiquing an exaggerated notion of meritocracy, I emphasize that structural racism, rather than just individual acts, facilitates collective advantages, especially for White males. Hence, it is morally fitting to frame racial justice in employment, not only in terms of perfect equality, but also in terms of justly sharing an imbalance that cannot be corrected without counterbalance. The “shared inequity” lens offers a more realistic and just approach to pursuing racial justice in the workplace.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-06-02

Downloads
12 (#1,092,892)

6 months
12 (#305,852)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Cedric Dawkins
Dalhousie University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references