On behalf of St Anselm

Analysis 75 (3):405-407 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Brian Garrett claims, in defence of Gaunilo’s Perfect Island and contra Plantinga, that ‘Properly understood, the great-making qualities of an island are maximal’. This article demonstrates that they are not, thus ‘the greatest conceivable island’ remains an incoherent concept and Gaunilo’s parody fails.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

On the Inherent Incoherence of Gaunilo's Island.Edgar Danielyan - 2021 - Heythrop Journal 62 (4):691-693.
Losing the Lost Island.Thomas M. Ward - 2018 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 83 (1):127-134.
Godelian ontological arguments.G. Oppy - 1996 - Analysis 56 (4):226-230.
Was Gaunilo Right in his Criticism of Anselm? A Contemporary Perspective.Woleński Jan - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4 (2):101--111.
On behalf of Gaunilo.B. Garrett - 2013 - Analysis 73 (3):481-482.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-06-14

Downloads
459 (#60,359)

6 months
71 (#81,945)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
The Constitution of Selves.Marya Schechtman (ed.) - 1996 - Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
God, freedom, and evil.Alvin Plantinga - 1974 - Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

View all 16 references / Add more references