Enaction Demands an Ontological Light Touch with Respect to the “Subject”

Constructivist Foundations 13 (3):381-382 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “What Is a Cognizing Subject? Construction, Autonomy and Original Causation” by Niall Palfreyman & Janice Miller-Young. Upshot: The goal of Palfreyman & Miller-Young is to characterize a particular kind of self-determining subject in a way that attempts to resolve divergence between realist, constructivist and enactive accounts. The divergences exist for a reason, and the subject in a realist framework cannot be equated with the subject as it features in an enactive account.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How Inherently Non-Autonomous Are Robots?Robert Lowe - 2018 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (3):379-381.
Enaction, and Its Relation to Science in an Objective Key.F. Cummins - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):245-246.
Subjectivity and the Encounter with Being.Jason M. Costanzo - 2015 - Review of Metaphysics 68 (3):593-614.
Agency is Distinct from Autonomy.Fred Cummins - 2014 - Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies (2):98-112.
Enactive subjectivity as flesh.John Jenkinson - 2017 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 16 (5):931-951.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-12

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fred Cummins
University College Dublin

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references