Misunderstood Circular Causation: “Who Implements Autonomy?” and “What Stabilises the Daisies?”

Constructivist Foundations 13 (3):374-376 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “What Is a Cognizing Subject? Construction, Autonomy and Original Causation” by Niall Palfreyman & Janice Miller-Young. Upshot: When a phenomenon, or a concept such as autonomy, is the outcome of circular causality then analysis in terms of linear causation is a recipe for misunderstanding. The Daisyworld parable as used here is an ideal testbed to illustrate such resulting confusions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How Inherently Non-Autonomous Are Robots?Robert Lowe - 2018 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (3):379-381.
Nonautonomous psychology.Bradford Petrie - 1990 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 28 (4):539-59.
The Compatibility of Downward Causation and Emergence.Simone Gozzano - 2017 - In Francesco Orilia & Michele Paolini Paoletti (eds.), Philosophical and Scientific Perspectives on Downward Causation. New York, uSA: Routledge. pp. 296-312.
A Model of Causation Is Not Causation.B. Edmonds - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (1):12-14.
Education and the Free Will Problem: A Spinozist Contribution.Johan Dahlbeck - 2017 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 51 (4):725-743.
A dilemma for the counterfactual analysis of causation.S. Barker - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (1):62 – 77.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-12

Downloads
4 (#1,618,541)

6 months
3 (#962,966)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references