Book Review: Cogent Science in Context: The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory, and Habermas [Book Review]

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (1):152-154 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/0048393110386672

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Review essay: William Rehg, Cogent Science in Context: The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory, and Habermas.John H. Zammito - 2011 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (3):359-365.
Book Review: Cogent Science in Context: The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory, and HabermasRehgWilliamCogent Science in Context: The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory, and HabermasCambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2009. 360 pp. $40. [REVIEW]K. Brad Wray - 2012 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (1):152-154.
Treating Kuhn’s Gap with Critical Contextualism. Review of William Rehg . Cogent Science in Context. The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory and Habermas, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. [REVIEW]Frank Zenker - unknown
Habermas meets science: William Rehg: Cogent science in context: The science wars, argumentation theory, and Habermas. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2009, 360pp, $40.00, £29.95 HB. [REVIEW]Stephen Turner - 2011 - Metascience 21 (2):419-423.
Habermas, Argumentation Theory, and Science Studies: Toward Interdisciplinary Cooperation.William Rehg - 2003 - Informal Logic 23 (2):161-182.
Review of William Rehg, Cogent Science in Context: The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory, and Habermas. [REVIEW]Paul A. Roth - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (10).
Rhetoric, Cogency, and the Radically Social Character of Persuasion: Habermas's Argumentation Theory Revisited.William Rehg - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4):465-492.
Argumentation and Transformation.Maeve Cooke - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (1):81-110.
Just and Unjust Wars - and Just and Unjust Arguments.Daniel H. Cohen - 2003 - In IL@25: Proceedings of the 2003 Meetings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.
A Pragma-Dialectical Approach of the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context.Eveline T. Feteris - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (3):349-367.
Predicaments of Communication, Argument, and Power: Towards a Critical Theory of Controversy.G. Thomas Goodnight - 2003 - Informal Logic 23 (2):119-137.
The drama of the science wars: what is the plot? [Review: Beyond the science wars: the missing discourse about science and society]. [REVIEW]Helena Sheehan - 2001 - Public Understanding of Science 10 (2).
Giving Reasons, A Contribution to Argumentation Theory.Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2011 - Theoria 26 (3):273-277.
After the Science Wars: Science and the Study of Science.Keith Ashman & Phillip Barringer (eds.) - 2000 - Routledge.
The Rationality of Legal Discourse in Habermas's Discourse Theory.Eveline T. Feteris - 2003 - Informal Logic 23 (2):139-159.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-21

Downloads
4 (#1,618,541)

6 months
3 (#962,966)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

K. Brad Wray
Aarhus University

Citations of this work

Scientific Community: A Moral Dimension.Kristina Rolin - 2017 - Social Epistemology 31 (5):468-483.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references