NIMBY Claims, Free Riders and Universalisability

Ethics, Place and Environment 13 (3):317-320 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In ‘Why not NIMBY?’, Simon Feldman and Derek Turner mount a compelling case that NIMBY claims are not intrinsically morally unjustified, despite the fact that NIMBY-claimants...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Free Rider Problems in Insurance-Based Private Defense.Robert Danneskjold - 2010 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 22 (1):509-525.
Costs and benefits in hunter-gatherer punishment.Christopher Boehm - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (1):19-20.
Brand Name Extortionists, Intellectual Prostitutes, and Generic Free Riders.Michael D. Bayles - 1984 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 2 (2):13-25.
Climate Change and Free Riding.Steve Vanderheiden - 2014 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 11 (4):1-27.
Free Riders,'Fair Share,'and the Principle of Fair Play.Scott C. Lowe - 1996 - Public Affairs Quarterly 10 (1):49-62.
Restorative Free Will: Back to the Biological Base.Bruce N. Waller - 2015 - Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books.
Free will skepticism and personhood as a desert base.Benjamin Vilhauer - 2009 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (3):pp. 489-511.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-15

Downloads
40 (#397,334)

6 months
6 (#514,728)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

G. K. D. Crozier
Laurentian University

References found in this work

Why Not NIMBY?Simon Feldman & Derek Turner - 2010 - Ethics, Place and Environment 13 (3):251-266.
Why Not NIMBY?Simon Feldman & Derek Turner - 2014 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 17 (1):105-115.

Add more references