Reassurance for the logic of paradox

Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):479-485 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Counterexamples to reassurance relative to a relation between models of the logic of paradox are provided. Another relation, designed to fix the problem in logic without equality, is introduced and discussed in connection with the issue of classical recapture

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

FDE Circumscription.Daniel Skurt - 2017 - Australasian Journal of Logic 14 (2).
Equality and Near-Equality in a Nonstandard World.Bruno Dinis - forthcoming - Logic and Logical Philosophy:1-14.
First-Order Friendliness.Guillermo Badia & David Makinson - forthcoming - Review of Symbolic Logic:1-15.
Why Priest's reassurance is not reassuring.Jc Beall - 2012 - Analysis 72 (3):517-525.
Formale Logik. [REVIEW]K. B. L. - 1959 - Review of Metaphysics 12 (4):665-665.
Intransitivity and vagueness.Joseph Y. Halpern - 2008 - Review of Symbolic Logic 1 (4):530-547.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
33 (#500,331)

6 months
10 (#308,654)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Minimally inconsistent LP.Graham Priest - 1991 - Studia Logica 50 (2):321 - 331.

Add more references