Expressive limitations of naïve set theory in lp and minimally inconsistent lp

Review of Symbolic Logic 7 (2):341-350 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A simple sequent system for minimally inconsisteny LP.Rea Golan - 2023 - Review of Symbolic Logic 16 (4):1296-1311.
Minimally inconsistent LP.Graham Priest - 1991 - Studia Logica 50 (2):321 - 331.
A note on naive set theory in ${\rm LP}$.Greg Restall - 1992 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 33 (3):422-432.
Remarks on naive set theory based on lp.Hitoshi Omori - 2015 - Review of Symbolic Logic 8 (2):279-295.
Multiple-conclusion lp and default classicality.Jc Beall - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (2):326-336.
Axioms for finite collapse models of arithmetic.Andrew Tedder - 2015 - Review of Symbolic Logic 8 (3):529-539.
On the First Order Logic true in every universe.Lech Dubikajtis - 2003 - Reports on Mathematical Logic:41-57.
Minimally Nonstandard K3 and FDE.Rea Golan & Ulf Hlobil - 2022 - Australasian Journal of Logic 19 (5):182-213.
Gp’s lp.Neil Tennant - 2019 - In Can Başkent & Thomas Macaulay Ferguson (eds.), Graham Priest on Dialetheism and Paraconsistency. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag. pp. 481-506.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-06-05

Downloads
9 (#1,270,032)

6 months
9 (#436,631)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Research on Set Theory Based on Paraconsistent Logic.Shi Jing - 2020 - International Journal of Philosophy 8 (2):43.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Multiple-conclusion lp and default classicality.Jc Beall - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (2):326-336.
Minimally inconsistent LP.Graham Priest - 1991 - Studia Logica 50 (2):321 - 331.
A note on naive set theory in ${\rm LP}$.Greg Restall - 1992 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 33 (3):422-432.
Reassurance for the logic of paradox.Marcel Crabbé - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):479-485.

Add more references