Can Keynesianism explain the 1930s? Rejoinder to Smiley

Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 5 (1):115-120 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No abstract

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can Keynesianism explain the 1930s? Reply to Cowen.Gene Smiley - 1991 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 5 (1):81-114.
Rejection and valuations.Luca Incurvati & Peter Smith - 2010 - Analysis 70 (1):3 - 10.
Why Keynesianism triumphed or, could so many Keynesians have been wrong?Tyler Cowen - 1989 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 3 (3-4):518-530.
Abstraction by recarving.Michael Potter & Timothy Smiley - 2001 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (3):327–338.
A Rejoinder to the Danapur Rejoinder.Raymond Wilson - 1984 - British Journal of Educational Studies 32 (1):55 - 57.
Marx in America: The New Deal.John F. Manley - 2003 - Science and Society 67 (1):9 - 38.
Heidegger toward the turn: essays on the work of the 1930s.James Risser (ed.) - 1999 - Albany: State University of New York Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-18

Downloads
18 (#828,704)

6 months
7 (#420,337)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

From Hayek to Keynes: G.L.S. shackle and ignorance of the future.Greg Hill - 2004 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 16 (1):53-79.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references