From Hayek to Keynes: G.L.S. shackle and ignorance of the future

Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 16 (1):53-79 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

G.L.S. Shackle stood at the historic crossroads where the economics of Hayek and Keynes met. Shackle fused these opposing lines of thought in a macroeconomic theory that draws Keynesian conclusions from Austrian premises. In Shackle 's scheme of thought, the power to imagine alternative courses of action releases decision makers from the web of predictable causation. But the spontaneous and unpredictable choices that originate in the subjective and disparate orientations of individual agents deny us the possibility of rational expectations, and therewith the logical coherence of market equilibrium over time

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-18

Downloads
62 (#255,386)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Popper, Weber, and Hayek: The epistemology and politics of ignorance.Jeffrey Friedman - 2005 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 17 (1-2):1-58.
Don't shoot the messenger: Caldwell's Hayek and the insularity of the Austrian project.Greg Hill - 2005 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 17 (1-2):69-88.
Imaginary goods and Keynesian Kaleidics: Rejoinder to Caldwell.Greg Hill - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (4):391-398.

Add more citations