Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (3):195-206 (2005)

At the heart of Peter Singer’s utilitarianism is the impartial weighing of the interests of those affected by our actions. Singer calls this the Principle of Equal Consideration of Interests. This paper argues that Singer’s Principle does not accord with our moral intuitions and the logic of our moral thinking. It discusses the Principle in the context of the parable of the Prodigal Son and his Brother – a parable that raises the issue of impartiality in a particularly challenging way. What the parable shows is, first, that our moral thinking often turns on judgements of fairness that are prior to any impartial weighing of interests; and, second, that impartial fairness itself is sometimes transcended by compassionate love. Both of these points have important implications for bioethics.
Keywords compassion  desert  equality  fairness  impartiality  Interests  love  necessity  wonder
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11017-005-3978-8
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,214
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Idealist Origins: 1920s and Before.Martin Davies & Stein Helgeby - 2014 - In Graham Oppy & Nick Trakakis (eds.), History of Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. pp. 15-54.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Fairness.Brad Hooker - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (4):329 - 352.
Rights, Interests, and Moral Equality.Meredith Williams - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (2):149-161.
Is Equal Moral Consideration Really Compatible with Unequal Moral Status?John Rossi - 2010 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (3):251-276.
Anosognosia, Interests and Equal Moral Consideration.Constance Perry - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (5):25-27.
When is Impartiality Morally Appropriate?Brad Hooker - 2010 - In Brian Feltham & John Cottingham (eds.), Partiality and Impartiality: Morality, Special Relationships, and the Wider World. Oxford University Press. pp. 26-41.
Sentientism, Wellbeing, and Environmentalism.Raffaele Rodogno - 2010 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (1):84-99.


Added to PP index

Total views
93 ( #125,657 of 2,507,567 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,263 of 2,507,567 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes