Critical Reply to'Culpability for Epistemic Injustice: Deontic or Aretetic'by Wayne Riggs

Social Epistemology: Review and Reply Collective 1 (5):3-6 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Echo Chambers, Epistemic Injustice, and Ignorance.Amandine Catala - 2021 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (3).
Are "Epistemic" and "Communicative" Models of Silencing in Conflict?Leo Townsend & Dina Lupin Townsend - 2021 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7 (10):27-32.
Testimonial Smothering’s Non-Epistemic Motives: A Reply to Goetze and Lee.Eric Bayruns García - 2022 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1 (11):18-20.
What is Hermeneutical Injustice and Who Should We Blame.Elinor Mason - 2021 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 10.
Epistemic Norms and Self Defeat: A Reply to Littlejohn.Jonathan Matheson - 2015 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4 (2):26-32.
I Don't Want to Change Your Mind: A Reply to Sherman.Natalia Washington - 2016 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective.
David-Hillel Ruben’s 'Traditions and True Successors': A Critical Reply.John N. Williams - 2013 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (7):40-45.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-21

Downloads
44 (#109,065)

6 months
6 (#1,472,471)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Coady
University of Tasmania

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references