Treating women as sex-objects

Journal of Social Philosophy 20 (3):5-20 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we have two related aims. First, we aim to present an account of what it is to treat women as sex-objects.1 Like other philosophical writers in the field, we hold that the central idea in an account of such treatment is the failure to treat women with proper respect in sexual behavior. This idea has been cashed out in terms of using,2 and in terms of dehumanization or failure to accord equal rights to freedom and welfare.3 However, we believe that there is a central deficiency in most such philosophical accounts of treating women as sex-objects, namely, a failure to outline in any detail a theory of interpersonal norms so that one can grasp in more concrete terms what it is to avoid treating a woman as a sex-object. We aim to rectify this deficiency by presenting a model of interpersonal norms based on the work of the social psychologist Chris Argyris

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
57 (#288,482)

6 months
3 (#1,046,495)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The definition of sexual harassment.Jan Crosthwaite & Graham Priest - 1996 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (1):66 – 82.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Using persons and common sense.Nancy Davis - 1984 - Ethics 94 (3):387-406.

Add more references