Chemical laws and theories: A response to Vihalemm [Book Review]

Foundations of Chemistry 5 (2):165-174 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX


A recent article by Vihalemm (Foundations of Chemistry, 2003) is critical of an earlier essay. We find that there is some justification for his criticism of vagueness in defining terms. Nevertheless the main conclusions of the earlier work, when carefully restated to deflect Vihalemm’s criticisms, are unaffected by his arguments. The various dicta that are used as the bases of chemical explanations are different in character, and are used in a different way from the laws and theories in classical physics.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

52 (#308,560)

6 months
8 (#371,375)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

How the laws of physics lie.Nancy Cartwright - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Philosophers Versus Chemists Concerning ‘laws Of Nature’.Maureen Christie - 1994 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (4):613-629.
Laws and Theories in Chemistry Do Not Obey the Rules.Maureen Christie - 2000 - In Bhushan & Rosenfeld (eds.), Of Minds and Molecules. Oxford University Press. pp. 34--50.

View all 6 references / Add more references