Philosophy of Science 63 (3):35 (1996)
AbstractRecent controversy over the existence of biological laws raises questions about the cognitive aims of theoretical modeling in that science. If there are no laws for successful theoretical models to approximate, then what is it that successful theories do? One response is to regard theoretical models as tools. But this instrumental reading cannot accommodate the explanatory role that theories are supposed to play. Yet accommodating the explanatory function, as articulated by Brandon and Sober for example, seems to involve us once again in a reliance on laws. The paper concludes that we must rethink both the nature of laws and theoretical explanation in biology
Similar books and articles
Sober and Elgin on laws of biology: A critique. [REVIEW]Lane DesAutels - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (2):249-256.
There may be strict empirical laws in biology, after all.Mehmet Elgin - 2006 - Biology and Philosophy 21 (1):119-134.
How is biological explanation possible?Alexander Rosenberg - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (4):735-760.
Allometries and scaling laws interpreted as laws: a reply to Elgin.Jani Raerinne - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (1):99-111.
Theoretical Models, Biological Complexity and the Semantic View of Theories.Barbara L. Horan - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:265 - 277.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
How could models possibly provide how-possibly explanations?Philippe Verreault-Julien - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 73:1-12.
Schaffner’s Model of Theory Reduction: Critique and Reconstruction.Rasmus Gr⊘Nfeldt Winther - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (2):119-142.
The aim and structure of ecological theory.Marcel Weber - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (1):71-93.
Przyczyna i Wyjaśnianie: Studium Z Filozofii i Metodologii Nauk.Paweł Kawalec - 2006 - Wydawnictwo KUL.
References found in this work
Philosophy and Scientific Realism.J. J. C. Smart - 1965\ - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15 (60):358-360.
Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement.Tim Maudlin & Nancy Cartwright - 1993 - Journal of Philosophy 90 (11):599.
Instrumental Biology or the Disunity of Science.Alexander Rosenberg - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (186):120-122.