Brain Death Revisited: The Case for a National Standard

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (4):824-836 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The concept of brain death — first defined decades ago — still presents medical, ethical, and legal challenges despite its widespread acceptance in clinical practice and in law. This article reviews the medicine, law, and ethics of brain death, including the current inconsistencies in brain death determinations, which a lack of standardized federal policy promotes, and argues that a standard brain death policy to be used by all hospitals in all states should be created

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Whole-Brain Concept of Death Remains Optimum Public Policy.James L. Bernat - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (1):35-43.
Abortion, Brain Death, and Coercion.Michael Nair-Collins - 2023 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 20 (3):359-365.
Brain Death — Too Flawed to Endure, Too Ingrained to Abandon.Robert D. Truog - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (2):273-281.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
37 (#444,844)

6 months
9 (#355,272)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Brain death without definitions.Winston Chiong - 2005 - Hastings Center Report 35 (6):20-30.
Brain Death without Definitions.Winston Chiong - 2005 - Hastings Center Report 35 (6):20.
The Clinical Response to Brain Death.Russell Burck, Lisa Anderson-Shaw, Mark Sheldon & Erin A. Egan - 2006 - Jona's Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation 8 (2):53-59.

Add more references