Evolutionary approaches to deprivation transform the ethics of policy making

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When designing public policies, decision makers often rely on their own behavioral preferences. Pepper & Nettle's theory suggests that these preferences are unlikely to be appropriate when applied to a different environment. This theory has profound implications for the design and ethics of public policies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cultural Evolution: Conceptual Challenges.Tim Lewens - 2015 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Prospects for evolutionary policy.Tim Lewens - 2003 - Philosophy 78 (4):495-514.
Using science, making policy: what should we worry about?Eleonora Montuschi - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 7 (1):57-78.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-02

Downloads
18 (#828,704)

6 months
1 (#1,462,504)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references