Evolutionary Ethics: An Irresistible Temptation: Some Reflections on Paul Farber‘s The Temptation of Evolutionary Ethics [Book Review]

Biology and Philosophy 12 (3):369-384 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In his recent The Temptation of Evolutionary Ethics, Paul Farber has given a negative assessment of the last one hundred years of attempts in Anglo-American philosophy, beginning with Darwin, to develop an evolutionary ethics. Farber identifies some version of the naturalistic fallacy as one of the central sources for the failures of evolutionary ethics. For this reason, and others, Farber urges that though it has its attraction, evolutionary ethics is a temptation to be resisted. In this discussion I identify three major, historically relevant forms of the naturalistic fallacy, the (1) the deductive, (2) genetic, and (3) open question forms and argue that none of them pose an intrinsic problem for evolutionary ethics. I conclude that on this score at least there is no reason to resist temptation.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 83,980

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

48 (#266,780)

6 months
1 (#509,414)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William A. Rottschaefer
Boston University (PhD)

References found in this work

Principia Ethica.G. E. Moore - 1903 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 13 (3):7-9.
Philosophy of Natural Science.Carl G. Hempel - 1967 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18 (1):70-72.
.Peter Railton - 1985 - Rowman & Littlefield.
Principia Ethica.Evander Bradley McGilvary - 1904 - Philosophical Review 13 (3):351.

View all 14 references / Add more references