A Comparison between Husserl, Heidegger and Gadamer With the Criterion of Methodology

Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 9 (34):113-138 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Today, phenomenology, hermeneutical phenomenology, and philosophical hermeneutics are increasingly considered as methodologies of research. However, there are some obscurities ambiguities in certain aspects of these methodologies. Examining the philosophical foundations of the above-mentioned methodologies, the present paper deals with the main similarities and differences of them; and finally, it highlights the differences of these approaches from a methodological viewpoint.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gadamer’s Critical Views of Husserl. Alireza - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 9 (16):23-42.
Philosophical Hermeneutics, 30th Anniversary Edition.David E. Linge (ed.) - 2008 - University of California Press.
Philosophical Hermeneutics: 30th Anniversary Edition.David E. Linge (ed.) - 2008 - University of California Press.
Hermeneutical Phenomenology.Gunter Figal - 2012 - In Dan Zahavi (ed.), The Oxford handbook of contemporary phenomenology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Assaying Vandevelde’s Approach to Gadamer.علیرضا آزادی - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 6 (11):39-52.
Husserl, Heidegger, and the Transcendental Dimension of Phenomenology.Archana Barua - 2007 - Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology 7 (1):1-10.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-24

Downloads
64 (#251,372)

6 months
1 (#1,469,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references