Models as Relational Categories

Science & Education 26 (7-9):777-798 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Model-based learning has an established position within science education. It has been found to enhance conceptual understanding and provide a way for engaging students in authentic scientific activity. Despite ample research, few studies have examined the cognitive processes regarding learning scientific concepts within MBL. On the other hand, recent research within cognitive science has examined the learning of so-called relational categories. Relational categories are categories whose membership is determined on the basis of the common relational structure. In this theoretical paper, I argue that viewing models as relational categories provides a well-motivated cognitive basis for MBL. I discuss the different roles of models and modeling within MBL and discern the related cognitive aspects brought forward by the reinterpretation of models as relational categories. I will argue that relational knowledge is vital in learning novel models and in the transfer of learning. Moreover, relational knowledge underlies the coherent, hierarchical knowledge of experts. Lastly, I will examine how the format of external representations may affect the learning of models and the relevant relations. The nature of the learning mechanisms underlying students’ mental representations of models is an interesting open question to be examined. Furthermore, the ways in which the expert-like knowledge develops and how to best support it is in need of more research. The discussion and conceptualization of models as relational categories allows discerning students’ mental representations of models in terms of evolving relational structures in greater detail than previously done.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Indigenous Psychology: Grounding Science in Culture, Why and How?Louise Sundararajan - 2015 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 45 (1):64-81.
Saturated models of intuitionistic theories.Carsten Butz - 2004 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 129 (1-3):245-275.
A brief survey of frames for the Lambek calculus.Kosta Došen - 1992 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 38 (1):179-187.
Relational Biology of Symbiosis.A. H. Louie - 2010 - Global Philosophy 20 (4):495-509.
Grammatical Constructions as Relational Categories.Micah B. Goldwater - 2017 - Topics in Cognitive Science 9 (3):776-799.
Representing with physical models.Ronald Giere - 2009 - In Paul Humphreys & Cyrille Imbert (eds.), Models, Simulations, and Representations. Routledge.
Relational Complexes.Joop Leo - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (2):357-390.
Models for the Lambek calculus.Mati Pentus - 1995 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 75 (1-2):179-213.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-15

Downloads
10 (#1,165,120)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
Models in Science (2nd edition).Roman Frigg & Stephan Hartmann - 2021 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Doing without concepts.Edouard Machery - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 33 references / Add more references