Pure Understanding, the Categories, and Kant's Critique of Wolff

In Kate A. Moran (ed.), Kant on Freedom and Spontaneity. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The importance of the pure concepts of the understanding (i.e. the categories) within Kant’s system of philosophy is undeniable. As I hope to make clear in this essay, however, the categories are also an essential part of Kant’s critique of Christian Wolff. In particular, I argue that Kant’s development of the categories represents a decisive break with the Wolffian conception of the understanding and that this break is central to understanding the task of the Transcendental Analytic. This break, however, is not merely that Kant affirms while Wolff and his followers deny a sharp distinction between sensibility and the understanding, which is the aspect of Kant’s rejection of Wolff that scholars most frequently note. Rather, this break concerns differences in their views about the understanding itself. For while Wolff conceives of the understanding as a mental capacity to extract and make distinct content already present in the senses, Kant conceives of the understanding in its “real use” as a capacity to produce purely intellectual content.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

I—Hegel's Critique of Kant.Stephen Houlgate - 2015 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 89 (1):21-41.
Transformations of Transcendental Philosophy: Wolff, Kant, and Hegel.Karin de Boer - 2011 - Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 32 (1-2):50-79.
The Analytic of Concepts.Andrew Stephenson & Anil Gomes - 2024 - In Mark Timmons & Sorin Baiasu (eds.), The Kantian Mind. London and New York: Routledge.
A Merely Logical Distinction.J. Colin McQuillan - 2016 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2):387-405.
Kant’s Response to the Principle of Sufficient Reason.Amanda Hicks - 2013 - In Stefano Bacin, Alfredo Ferrarin, Claudio La Rocca & Margit Ruffing (eds.), Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht. Akten des XI. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Boston: de Gruyter. pp. 359-370.
Kant on the Inapplicability of the Categories to Things in Themselves.Markus Kohl - 2015 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (1):90-114.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-12-03

Downloads
565 (#2,815)

6 months
110 (#157,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brian A. Chance
University of Oklahoma

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Kant and the Claims of Knowledge.Paul Guyer - 1987 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kant's metaphysic of experience.H. J. Paton - 1936 - London,: G. Allen & Unwin.
Early German Philosophy: Kant and His Predecessors.Lewis White Beck - 1969 - Cambridge, Mass.,: St. Augustine's Press.
Kant's Metaphysic of Experience.H. J. Paton - 1937 - Philosophy 12 (45):99-104.

View all 18 references / Add more references