At first glance, the first informed consent case to be decided by the High Court of Australia appears to be little more than a clear and simple description of the substantive law accepted in most American jurisdictions—although that is no small accomplishment in and of itself. In Rogers v. Whitaker, the highest court in Aus [Book Review]

&
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2:371-379 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Malpractice Liability for the Failure to Adequately Educate Patients: The Australian Law of “Informed Consent” and Its Implications for American Ethics Committees.Don Chalmers & Robert Schwartz - 1993 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2 (3):371.
Montgomery, informed consent and causation of harm: lessons from Australia or a uniquely English approach to patient autonomy?Malcolm K. Smith & Tracey Carver - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (6):384-388.
Rogers v Whitaker, Chappel v Hart and the Evolving Nature of Informed Consent.Anna Stokes - 1999 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 4 (3):4.
Physician-Assisted Suicide in Psychiatry: Developments in the Netherlands.Johan Legemaate & J. K. M. Gevers - 1997 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (2):175.
Mitigation Evidence and the Ethical Role of a Defense Attorney in a Capital Case.Lisa Bell Holleran - 2017 - Criminal Justice Ethics 36 (1):97-110.
Bell v Tavistock: Rethinking informed decision-making as the practical device of consent for medical treatment.Abeezar I. Sarela - 2022 - Clinical Ethics 17 (3):241-247.
On Interpretation and Appreciation. A European Human Rights Perspective on Dobbs.Martin Buijsen - 2023 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (3):323-336.
The Patient's Right to Refuse AntiPsychotic Drugs: The Court of Appeals Decision In Rogers v. Okin.Richard Cole - 1981 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 9 (1):10-13.
High court case: Williams v the commonwealth.Max Wallace - 2012 - The Australian Humanist 107 (107):5.
Incorporating Exclusion Clauses into Informed Consent for Biobanking.Zubin Master & David B. Resnik - 2013 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 22 (2):203-212.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-01

Downloads
6 (#711,559)

6 months
1 (#1,912,481)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

D. Chalmers
Robert Schwartz
University of Abertay Dundee

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references