Some comments on fatalism

Philosophical Quarterly 46 (182):1-11 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper discusses fatalism, defined as the view that it is never both in one's power to do X and in one's power to not do X. It is argued that this view is made out as more plausible than it really is, because of unclarity as to its meaning. Some philosophers, such as Michael Dummett or David Lewis, who criticise fatalism, actually advocate views closely in line with fatalism as defined here

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the cannot of infallibility.Alex Blum - 2005 - Sophia 44 (1):125-127.
On fate and fatalism.Robert C. Solomon - 2003 - Philosophy East and West 53 (4):435-454.
Fatalism.M. Benstein - 1992 - University of Nebraska Press.
Causal discontinuity in fatalism and indeterminism.H. Rensselaer Wilsovann - 1955 - Journal of Philosophy 52 (February):70-71.
Compatibilist fatalism.Paul Russell - 2000 - In A. van den Beld (ed.), Moral Responsibility and Ontology. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 199--218.
Fatalism.M. Bernstein - 2001 - In Robert Kane (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press.
Looking for the Lazy Argument Candidates.Vladimir Marko - 2011 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 18 (3 & 4):363-383; 447-474.
On a theological argument for fatalism.Susan Haack - 1974 - Philosophical Quarterly 24 (95):156-159.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
127 (#140,113)

6 months
18 (#135,981)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Cargile
University of Virginia

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references