Forget Taste

Journal of Aesthetic Education 56 (1):1-27 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

“Forget Taste” rejects the classical notion of taste as a viable concept for the exercise of critical evaluation and proposes an alternative approach to critical evaluation based crucially on the idea of the constitutive purpose of the artwork. The goal of this paper is to advance an approach—which I call the purpose-driven approach—to the critical evaluation of artworks that develops from and refines the views of art evaluation presented in my previous work. This approach, in virtue of its focus on the constitutive purposes of artworks, regards the artwork as typically singular. For that reason, it follows that this approach is pluralistic in contrast to the hedonic conception of the taste model popularized in the eighteenth century and which still recurs today, if sometimes only subconsciously, and that reduces critical evaluation to feelings of pleasure. I argue that the hedonic taste model, which is noncognitive and reductive, should be abandoned in favor of one that is cognitivist and pluralistic, namely, the purpose-driven approach.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Acquired Taste.Kevin Melchionne - 2007 - Contemporary Aesthetics.
Just a Matter of Taste.Vivian Mizrahi - 2017 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 8 (2):411-431.
Aesthetic Taste.Michael R. Spicher - 2017 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Ought We to Forget What We Cannot Forget? A Reply to Sybille Schmidt.Attila Tanyi - 2015 - In Giovanni Galizia & David Shulman (eds.), Forgetting: An Interdisciplinary Conversation. Magnes Press of the Hebrew University. pp. 258-262.
Educated tastes.Liselotte Hedegaard - 2018 - Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi 6 (2):1-14.
Hume’s Aesthetic Standard.Elisa Galgut - 2012 - Hume Studies 38 (2):183-200.
Aesthetic Taste Now: A Look Beyond Art and the History of Philosophy.Michael R. Spicher - 2020 - Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics 3 (43):159-167.
Good Taste, Bad Taste, and Christian Taste.Frank Burch Brown - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (3):284-285.
The Taste Question in Animal Ethics.Jean Kazez - 2017 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 35 (4):661-674.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-01

Downloads
123 (#144,868)

6 months
45 (#91,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Noel Carroll
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

Artistic Exceptionalism and the Risks of Activist Art.Christopher Earley - 2023 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 81 (2):141-152.
Categorizing Art.Kiyohiro Sen - 2024 - Dissertation, University of Tokyo

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references