Common Ground and Argument by Indirection in Two Seventeenth-Century Sermons

Abstract

Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet's sermon to Louis XIV on the "Devoirs des rois" and John Donne's sermon to Queen Anne at Denmark House are both texts that offer indirect critiques of their royal audiences--critiques which, if stated more bluntly, might be politically dangerous to the respective speakers. What makes such oblique criticism "safe" and what ultimately makes it understood? The answer lies in the rhetor's ability to build common ground with the audience.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Prolepsis: Dealing with Multiple Viewpoints in Argument.Patrick Clauss - 2007 - In Christopher W. Tindale Hans V. Hansen (ed.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground. Ossa. pp. 1--17.
Presuppositions and common ground.Barbara Abbott - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (5):523-538.
Conscience and Self-Love in Butler's Sermons.Alan R. White - 1952 - Philosophy 27 (103):329 - 344.
Is Common Ground a Word or Just a Sound?Paola Cantù - 2007 - In H. V. Hanson (ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference: Dissensus & The Search for Common Ground. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. pp. 1--9.
Ground.Michael J. Raven - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (5):322-333.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
2 (#1,800,073)

6 months
1 (#1,469,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

A Rhetoric of Irony.Wayne C. Booth - 1975 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 8 (2):123-129.

Add more references