Fighting Science with Science: Counter-Expertise Production in Anti-Shale Gas Mobilizations in France and Poland

NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 30 (3):345-375 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Between the second half of the 2000s and the first half of the 2010s, the prospect of shale gas extraction in Europe at first prompted fervent political support, then met with local and national opposition, and was finally rendered moot by a global collapse in the oil price. In the Europe-wide protests against shale gas and the main technique employed to extract it, hydraulic fracturing, counter-expertise played a crucial role. This kind of expertise is one of the main elements of “energy citizenship,” a concept recently developed in the field of energy humanities which describes the empowerment of citizens in decision-making processes related to energy issues. This paper provides a socio-historical analysis of the co-production of counter-expertise and energy citizenship in the two European countries endowed with the largest shale gas reserves: Poland and France. In my analysis, concerns over the disruption of the food-water-energy nexus due to possible pollution emerge as particularly important. I argue that the exchange of information between activist groups and NGOs, as well as between activist groups from distant European locations, allowed for the creation of a genuinely transnational and science-based anti-fracking movement.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,038

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Counter-Expertise.Asya A. Filatova - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (2):48-57.
Rationally self-ascribed anti-expertise.Nicolas Bommarito - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 151 (3):413-419.
Incline and Admonish.Sergei Yu Shevchenko - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (2):20-32.
Ad Hominem Arguments, Rhetoric, and Science Communication.Carlo Martini - 2018 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 55 (1):151-166.
Expert and Layman.Elena V. Bryzgalina & Vladimir N. Kiselev - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (2):33-41.
Philosophical expertise and scientific expertise.Jennifer Ellen Nado - 2015 - Philosophical Psychology 28 (7):1026-1044.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-19

Downloads
5 (#1,541,770)

6 months
3 (#979,100)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations