The Ethical Interest of Frankenstein; Or, the Modern Prometheus: A Literature Review 200 Years After Its Publication

Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (5):2791-2808 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two hundred years after it was first published, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein; or, the modern Prometheus remains relevant. This novel has endured because of its literary merits and because its themes lend themselves to analysis from multiple viewpoints. Scholars from many disciplines have examined this work in relation to controversial scientific research. In this paper, we review the academic literature where Frankenstein is used to discuss ethics, bioethics, science, technology and medicine. We searched the academic literature and carried out a content analysis of articles discussing the novel and films derived from it, analyzing the findings qualitatively and quantitatively. We recorded the following variables: year and language of publication, whether it referred to the novel or to a film, the academic discipline in which it was published, and the topics addressed in the analysis. Our findings indicate that the scientific literature on Frankenstein focuses mainly on science and the personality of the scientist rather than on the creature the scientist created or ethical aspects of his research. The scientist’s responsibility is central to the ethical interest of Frankenstein; this issue entails both the motivation underlying the scientist’s acts and the consequences of these acts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

200 Years After Frankenstein.Christopher Nowlin - 2018 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 61 (3):430-449.
Frankenstein as Science Fiction and Fact.J. M. van der Laan - 2010 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 30 (4):298-304.
Frankenstein as Cautionary Tale for Medical Humanities? A Brief Coda.Anne Hudson Jones - 2019 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 62 (4):710-716.
The Frankenstein Paradigm: More than human, less than nothing.Paulo Alexandre E. Castro - 2021 - International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences 6 (2):35-39.
Why Frankenstein is a Stigma Among Scientists.Peter Nagy, Ruth Wylie, Joey Eschrich & Ed Finn - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4):1143-1159.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-13

Downloads
34 (#457,633)

6 months
12 (#306,076)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?