Rereading Frankenstein: What If Victor Frankenstein Had Actually Been Evil?

Hastings Center Report 48 (6):21-24 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As we reread Mary Shelley's Frankenstein at two hundred years, it is evident that Victor Frankenstein is both a mad scientist (fevered, obsessive) and a bad scientist (secretive, hubristic, irresponsible). He's also not a very nice person. He's a narcissist, a liar, and a bad “parent.” But he is not genuinely evil. And yet when we reimagine him as evil—as an evil scientist and as an evil person—we can learn some important lessons about science and technology, our contemporary society, and ourselves.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Frankenstein lives on.Belt Henk - 2018 - Science 359 (6372):137.
Hybrids of the Romantic: Frankenstein, Olimpia, and Artificial Life.Silvia Micheletti - 2018 - Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 41 (2):146-155.
200 Years After Frankenstein.Christopher Nowlin - 2018 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 61 (3):430-449.
Why Frankenstein is a Stigma Among Scientists.Peter Nagy, Ruth Wylie, Joey Eschrich & Ed Finn - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4):1143-1159.
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, the Guillotine, and Modern Ontological Anxiety.Kristen Lacefield - 2016 - Text Matters - a Journal of Literature, Theory and Culture 6 (1):35-52.
I, Corpenstein: Mythic, Metaphorical and Visual Renderings of the Corporate Form in Comics and Film.Timothy D. Peters - 2017 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 30 (3):427-454.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-27

Downloads
30 (#504,503)

6 months
9 (#250,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jason Robert
Arizona State University

References found in this work

The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy.Newton Garver - 1981 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 41 (4):562-563.
The Claim of Reason by Stanley Cavell. [REVIEW]Morris Weitz - 1981 - Journal of Philosophy 78 (1):50-56.

Add more references