The effects of inescapable shock on the retention of a previously learned response in an appetitive situation with delay of reinforcement

, , , &
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24 (3):213-216 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3758/bf03330552

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The effects of noncontingent reinforcement on the behavior of a previously learned running response.Richard S. Calef, Michael C. Choban, Marcus W. Dickson, Paul D. Newman, Maureen Boyle, Nikki D. Baxa & E. Scott Geller - 1989 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27 (3):263-266.
Effects of reinforcement delay during learning on the retention of verbal material in adults.Larry M. Lintz & Yvonne Brackbill - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (2):194.
Preference-for-signaled-shock phenomenon: Effects of shock modifiability and light reinforcement.Gerald B. Biederman & John J. Furedy - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 100 (2):380.
The effects of inescapable shock on appetitive motivation.Mark Plonsky, Donald A. Warren & Robert A. Rosellini - 1984 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 22 (3):229-231.
Effects of inescapable shock in the rat: Learned helplessness or response competition.David R. Burdette, David S. Krantz & Abram Amsel - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 6 (1):96-98.
Amplitude of response and the delay-retention effect.Yvonne Brackbill, William E. Boblitt, Douglas Davlin & John E. Wagner - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (1):57.
Shock-right discrimination training: Effect of correction training with an enforced delay following an incorrect choice.Philip F. Spelt & Harry Fowler - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (3p1):504.
Debilitated shock escape is produced by both short- and long-duration inescapable shock: Learned helplessness vs. learned inactivity.Aidan Altenor, Joseph R. Volpicelli & Martin E. P. Seligman - 1979 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 14 (5):337-339.
Feedback and the delay-retention effect.Nancy Markowitz & K. Edward Renner - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (3):452.
Reinforcement difference limen (RDL) for delay in shock escape.Roger M. Tarpy - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (1p1):116.
Effects of unsolvable anagrams on retention.Richard S. Calef, Michael C. Choban, Ruth Ann Calef, Roberta L. Brand, Malcolm J. Rogers & E. Scott Geller - 1992 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30 (2):164-166.
Effects of delay on subsequent running under immediate reinforcement.Joseph A. Sgro & Solomon Weinstock - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (3):260.
Retention and subsequent extinction of a simple running response following varying conditions of reinforcement.F. W. Finger - 1942 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 31 (2):120.
The retention of a simple running response after varying amounts of reinforcement.F. A. Mote & F. W. Finger - 1943 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 33 (4):317.
A quantitative investigation of the delay-of-reinforcement gradient.C. T. Perin - 1943 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 32 (1):37.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-22

Downloads
25 (#629,577)

6 months
6 (#507,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references