Retention and subsequent extinction of a simple running response following varying conditions of reinforcement

Journal of Experimental Psychology 31 (2):120 (1942)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0055418

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The retention of a simple running response after varying amounts of reinforcement.F. A. Mote & F. W. Finger - 1943 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 33 (4):317.
The effect of varying conditions of reinforcement upon a simple running response.F. W. Finger - 1942 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 30 (1):53.
Exploratory drive and secondary reinforcement in the acquisition and extinction of a simple running response.F. A. Mote & F. W. Finger - 1942 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 31 (1):57.
The effect of different amounts of reinforcement upon the acquisition and extinction of a simple running response.F. A. Mote - 1944 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 34 (3):216.
Effect of magnitude of reinforcement on acquisition and extinction of a running response.Harvard L. Armus - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (1):61.
Role of the instrumental response in the partial reinforcement effect.R. K. Banks - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (1):133.
Response latency as a function of the amount of reinforcement.David Zeaman - 1949 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 39 (4):466.
Acquisition and extinction of a partially reinforced running response at a 24-hour intertrial interval.Solomon Weinstock - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (2):151.
Extinction of a continuously rewarded barpressing response following continuous or partial reinforcement of a running response in rats.Robert L. Woods & Charles I. Brooks - 1977 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 10 (4):317-318.
Retention of T-maze learning after varying intervals following partial and continuous reinforcement.Winfred F. Hill, John W. Cotton, Norman E. Spear & Carl P. Duncan - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (3p1):584.
Effects of delay on subsequent running under immediate reinforcement.Joseph A. Sgro & Solomon Weinstock - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (3):260.
Some relations between the intensive properties of the consummatory response and reinforcement.George Collier, Frederick A. Knarr & Melvin H. Marx - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (5):484.
Speed of running in extinction as a function of differential goal box retention time.H. E. Klugh - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (2):172.
Replication report: An attempt to obtain inhibition with reinforcement.Stephanie S. Fuchs - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (5):343.
Extinction by omission of food as related to partial and secondary reinforcement.Stewart H. Hulse Jr & Walter C. Stanley - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 52 (4):221.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
16 (#855,572)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references