The effects of noncontingent reinforcement on the behavior of a previously learned running response

, , , , , &
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27 (3):263-266 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3758/bf03334602

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The effects of inescapable shock on the retention of a previously learned response in an appetitive situation with delay of reinforcement.Richard S. Calef, Michael C. Choban, Jim P. Shaver, Jack D. Dye & E. Scott Geller - 1986 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24 (3):213-216.
Behavior in a continuous-response task with noncontingent reinforcement.Seymour Rosenberg - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (2):168.
Behavior in a continuous-response task with quasi-determinate, noncontingent reinforcement.Seymour Rosenberg - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (5):700.
Effect of noncontingent partial reinforcement on the resistance to extinction of a runway response.Milton A. Trapold & David G. Doren - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (3):429.
The effect of varying conditions of reinforcement upon a simple running response.F. W. Finger - 1942 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 30 (1):53.
Effects of delay on subsequent running under immediate reinforcement.Joseph A. Sgro & Solomon Weinstock - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (3):260.
Retention and subsequent extinction of a simple running response following varying conditions of reinforcement.F. W. Finger - 1942 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 31 (2):120.
The retention of a simple running response after varying amounts of reinforcement.F. A. Mote & F. W. Finger - 1943 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 33 (4):317.
Effect of magnitude of reinforcement on acquisition and extinction of a running response.Harvard L. Armus - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (1):61.
Effects of nonreinforced trials in two-choice learning with noncontingent reinforcement.James G. Greeno - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (4):373.
The effect of different amounts of reinforcement upon the acquisition and extinction of a simple running response.F. A. Mote - 1944 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 34 (3):216.
Effect of volume of reinforcement and number of consummatory responses on licking and running behavior.Harry L. Snyder & Stewart H. Hulse - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (6):474.
Exploratory drive and secondary reinforcement in the acquisition and extinction of a simple running response.F. A. Mote & F. W. Finger - 1942 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 31 (1):57.
Role of the instrumental response in the partial reinforcement effect.R. K. Banks - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (1):133.
Effects of baseline self-reinforcement behavior and training level on posttraining self-reinforcement behavior.Albert Kozma & Pamela Easterbrook - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (2):256.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-22

Downloads
19 (#732,197)

6 months
7 (#285,926)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references