Reinforcement difference limen (RDL) for delay in shock escape

Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (1p1):116 (1969)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0026988

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The reinforcement difference limen (RDL) function for shock reduction.Byron A. Campbell - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 52 (4):258.
Escape performance as a function of delay of reinforcement.Harry Fowler & Milton A. Trapold - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (5):464.
Children's escape performance as a function of schedules of delay of reinforcement.Ronald K. Penney - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (1):109.
The properties of stimuli associated with shock reduction.M. D. Nefzger - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (3):184.
Shock-right discrimination training: Effect of correction training with an enforced delay following an incorrect choice.Philip F. Spelt & Harry Fowler - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (3p1):504.
Amount, delay, and position of delay of reinforcement as parameters of runway performance.Eugene R. Wist - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (2):160.
Escape learning as a function of amount of shock reduction.G. H. Bower, H. Fowler & M. A. Trapold - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (6):482.
Steep delay of reinforcement gradient in escape conditioning with altruistic reinforcement.Robert Frank Weiss, Joe Shelby Cecil & Marcy J. Frank - 1973 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 2 (6):372-374.
Effect of escape duration and shock intensity on the acquisition and extinction of an escape response.Homer E. Stavely Jr - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (5):698.
A failure to transfer control of keypecking from food reinforcement to escape from and avoidance of shock.Barry Schwartz & Geoffrey Coulter - 1973 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1 (5):307-309.
Preference-for-signaled-shock phenomenon: Effects of shock modifiability and light reinforcement.Gerald B. Biederman & John J. Furedy - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 100 (2):380.
A delay of reinforcement gradient and correlated reinforcement in the instrumental conditioning of conversational behavior.Robert F. Weiss, Jenny L. Boyer, James T. Colwick & Dennis J. Moran - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 90 (1):33.
The effects of inescapable shock on the retention of a previously learned response in an appetitive situation with delay of reinforcement.Richard S. Calef, Michael C. Choban, Jim P. Shaver, Jack D. Dye & E. Scott Geller - 1986 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24 (3):213-216.
Secondary reinforcement and shock termination.Robert A. Kinsman & V. Edwin Bixenstine - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (1p1):62.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
8 (#1,287,956)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references