Eliminating Footnotes Makes Philosophy More Accessible

Blog of the American Philosophical Association (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It’s 2019. Computers can drive cars, operate stores, and outperform humans in sophisticated games. However, computers cannot correctly read a PDF with footnotes. Alas, many people have to rely on their computers to read PDF papers. So, many people face significant obstacles while trying to consume written research. That seems bad. Insofar as we can prevent this bad outcome without making matters worse, we should.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Jurimetrics. [REVIEW]B. P. R. - 1965 - Review of Metaphysics 18 (4):782-782.
Is It Bad to Prefer Attractive Partners?William D'Alessandro - 2023 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 9 (2):335-354.
A Way Through the Global Techno-Scientific Culture.Sheldon Richmond - 2020 - Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Sholars Publishing.
Toleration and Recognition: What should we teach?Peter Nigel Jones - 2010 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (1):38-56.
Formulating the explanatory gap.Yujin Nagasawa - 2007 - American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers 7.
Comparative Harm, Creation and Death.Neil Feit - 2016 - Utilitas 28 (2):136-163.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-06

Downloads
18 (#1,090,118)

6 months
3 (#1,467,341)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nick Byrd
Geisinger College of Health Sciences

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references