Derrida and Asian Thought

Comparative and Continental Philosophy 12 (1):2-4 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis paper draws a comparison between Derrida’s “trace” and the idea of dao in classical Daoism. It is argued that if dao is read in a non-metaphysical way, then the Derridean idea of “trace” will show large overlaps with dao. I then show how, despite some obvious differences, a “trace” reading of dao enables a clearer understanding of dao that would see it not as a metaphysical principle, ineffable but transcendent nonetheless, but rather as an immanent working of the patterned processes that makes up both the natural and human world. I also argue that the notion of trace in classical Daoism or other characters denoting trace, are most often used in a more traditional way and hence are not useful for understanding what Derrida means with his notion of “trace.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Derrida and Comparative Philosophy.Steven Burik - 2014 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 6 (2):125-142.
Genesis and Trace: Derrida Reading Husserl and Heidegger.Simon Sparks (ed.) - 2005 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Genesis and trace: Derrida reading Husserl and Heidegger.Paola Marrati - 2005 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-03-07

Downloads
11 (#1,161,724)

6 months
7 (#486,337)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steven Burik
Singapore Management University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references