An orangutan in Paris: pondering Proximity at the Muséum d’histoire naturelle in 1836

History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 40 (1):20 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When the Muséum d’histoire naturelle in Paris learned in 1836 that it had the chance to buy a live, young orangutan, it was excited by the prospect. Specimens were the focus of the Museum’s activities, and this particular specimen seemed especially promising, not only because the Museum had very few orangutan specimens in its collection, but also because of what was perceived to be the orangutan’s unique place in the natural order of things, namely, at the very boundary between the animal kingdom and humans. Frédéric Cuvier, the superintendent of the Museum’s menagerie, urged that studying the orangutan’s mental faculties would help resolve fundamental questions regarding the similarities and differences between animals and humans. Archival and printed sources allow one to reconstruct the orangutan’s capture, acquisition, and subsequent career at the menagerie in greater detail than has generally been possible for animals of nineteenth-century zoos. Scientists, artists, the public, the press, and even musicians sought to engage with the orangutan, seeing in it not just another ape or monkey but a special creature unto itself at the animal/human boundary. Key to their fascination with the orangutan was the question of proximity—just how close was the orangutan to humans? The orangutan’s story illuminates not only how the animal-human boundary was conceived at the time but also the problematic status of the zoo as a site for scientific research and the roles of scientific and non-scientific actors alike in constructing how the orangutan was understood.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Language and the orangutan: the old “person” of the forest.H. Lyn Miles - 1993 - In Peter Singer & Paola Cavalieri (eds.), The Great Ape Project. St. Martin's Griffin. pp. 42--57.
Simon says: The development of imitation in a signing orangutan.H. L. Miles, R. W. Mitchell & S. E. Harper - 1996 - In A. Russon, Kim A. Bard & S. Parkers (eds.), Reaching Into Thought: The Minds of the Great Apes. Cambridge University Press. pp. 521--562.
Imitation, pretense and self-awareness in a signing orangutan.H. L. Miles, R. W. Mitchell & S. Harper - 1996 - In A. Russon, Kim A. Bard & S. Parkers (eds.), Reaching Into Thought: The Minds of the Great Apes. Cambridge University Press. pp. 278--299.
The Multiplicity of Humanity in the Orangutan Adoption Accounts of Alfred Russel Wallace and William Temple Hornaday.Tiffany Tsao - 2013 - Clio: A Journal of Literature, History, and the Philosophy of History 43 (1):1-32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-23

Downloads
37 (#430,171)

6 months
6 (#514,728)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Introduction to “Working Across Species”.Rachel Mason Dentinger & Abigail Woods - 2018 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 40 (2):30.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?David Premack & G. Woodruff - 1978 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (4):515-629.
Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?David Premack & Guy Woodruff - 1978 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1 (4):515-526.
The great apes. A study of anthropoïd life.R. M. Yerkes & A. W. Yerkes - 1932 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 114:464-466.
Buffon: A Life in Natural History.Jacques Roger, Sarah Lucille Bonnefoi & L. Pearce Williams - 1998 - Journal of the History of Biology 31 (2):298-300.

View all 8 references / Add more references