- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Choosing for Another: Beyond Autonomy and Best Interests
Hastings Center Report 39 (2):31-37 (2009)
Abstract
According to bioethics orthodoxy, the question, “What would the patient choose?” is a question about the patient's autonomy. is at stake. In fact, what underpins the moral force of that question is a value different from either autonomy or best interests. This is the value of doing things in a way that is authentic to the person.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Minors Lack the Autonomy to Consent to Gender‐Affirming Care: Best Interests Must Be Primary.Johan C. Bester - 2024 - Hastings Center Report 54 (3):57-58.
The Intimate Responsibility of Surrogate Decision‐Making.Hilde Lindemann - 2018 - Hastings Center Report 48 (1):41-42.
Agency and authenticity: Which value grounds patient choice?Daniel Brudney & John Lantos - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (4):217-227.
Capacity for Preferences and Pediatric Assent: Implications for Pediatric Practice.Mark Christopher Navin & Jason Adam Wasserman - 2019 - Hastings Center Report 49 (1):43-51.
Rational non-interventional paternalism: why doctors ought to make judgments of what is best for their patients.J. Savulescu - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (6):327-331.
On the autonomy turf. Assessing the value of autonomy to patients.Lars Sandman - 2005 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (3):261-268.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-11
Downloads
53 (#292,995)
6 months
3 (#1,206,820)
2010-09-11
Downloads
53 (#292,995)
6 months
3 (#1,206,820)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Reframing Consent for Clinical Research: A Function-Based Approach.Scott Y. H. Kim, David Wendler, Kevin P. Weinfurt, Robert Silbergleit, Rebecca D. Pentz, Franklin G. Miller, Bernard Lo, Steven Joffe, Christine Grady, Sara F. Goldkind, Nir Eyal & Neal W. Dickert - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (12):3-11.
Clarifying substituted judgement: the endorsed life approach: Table 1.John Phillips & David Wendler - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (9):723-730.
Advance Directives: The Principle of Determining Authenticity.Matilda Carter - 2022 - Hastings Center Report 52 (1):32-41.
From “Informed” to “Engaged” Consent: Risks and Obligations in Consent for Participation in a Health Data Repository.Elizabeth Bromley, Alexandra Mendoza-Graf, Sandra Berry, Camille Nebeker & Dmitry Khodyakov - 2020 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (1):172-182.
Surrogates and Artificial Intelligence: Why AI Trumps Family.Ryan Hubbard & Jake Greenblum - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (6):3217-3227.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-7g5mb uwo