Mary Astell on Marriage and Lockean Slavery

History of Political Thought 35 (4):717–38 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In the 1706 third edition of her Reflections upon Marriage, Mary Astell alludes to John Locke’s definition of slavery in her descriptions of marriage. She describes the state of married women as being ‘subject to the inconstant, uncertain, unknown, Arbitrary Will of another Man’ (Locke, Two Treatises, II.22). Recent scholars maintain that Astell does not seriously regard marriage as a form of slavery in the Lockean sense. In this paper, I defend the contrary position: I argue that Astell does seriously regard marriage as a form of slavery for women and that she condemns this state of affairs as morally wrong. I also show that, far from criticizing Locke, Astell draws on key passages in his Thoughts concerning Education to urge that women be educated to retain their liberty.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Serious Proposal to the Ladies.Mary Astell (ed.) - 2002 - Broadview Press.
Custom Freedom and Equality: Mary Astell on marriage and women's education.Karen Detlefsen - 2016 - In Penny Weiss & Alice Sowaal (eds.), Feminist Interpretations of Mary Astell. Pennsylvania State University Press. pp. 74-92.
Locke and the Problem of Slavery.Douglas Lewis - 2003 - Teaching Philosophy 26 (3):261-282.
Mary Astell.Alice Sowaal - 2007 - Journal of the History of Philosophy.
Mary Astell: Theorist of freedom from domination.Alice Sowaal - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2):pp. 322-323.
Kant on the Law of Marriage.Allan Beever - 2013 - Kantian Review 18 (3):339-362.


Added to PP

471 (#22,606)

6 months
31 (#40,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jacqueline Broad
Monash University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references