Adversaries or allies? Occasional thoughts on the Masham-Astell exchange

Eighteenth-Century Thought 1:123-49 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the English reception of Locke’s Essay, stands a little-known philosophical dispute between two seventeenth-century women writers: Mary Astell (1666-1731) and Damaris Cudworth Masham (1659-1708). On the basis of their brief but heated exchange, Astell and Masham are typically regarded as philosophical adversaries: Astell a disciple of the occasionalist John Norris, and Masham a devout Lockean. In this paper, I argue that although there are many respects in which Astell and Masham are radically opposed, the two women also have a surprising amount in common. Rather than interpret their ideas solely in relation to the ‘canonical’ philosophies of the time – Lockean empiricism and Malebranchean occasionalism – I examine the ways in which Astell and Masham are influenced by the metaphysical theories of the Cambridge Platonists, Ralph Cudworth and Henry More. On this basis, I argue that a remarkably similar theological approach underlies the metaphysical and feminist arguments of Astell and Masham.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Love of God and Love of Creatures: The Masham-Astell Debate.Catherine Wilson - 2004 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 21 (3):281 - 298.
Leibniz on Hobbes’s Materialism.Stewart Duncan - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (1):11-18.
A Serious Proposal to the Ladies.Mary Astell (ed.) - 2002 - Broadview Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-11-06

Downloads
414 (#27,087)

6 months
48 (#27,987)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jacqueline Broad
Monash University

Citations of this work

A Minimalist Account of Love.Getty L. Lustila - 2021 - In Rachel Fedock, Michael Kühler & T. Raja Rosenhagen (eds.), Love, Justice, and Autonomy: Philosophical Perspectives. New York: Routledge. pp. 61-78.
Mary Astell.M. Sowal - 2005 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Lady damaris masham.Sarah Hutton - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Appendix.[author unknown] - 1994 - Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft Und Geistesgeschichte 68 (1):289-289.
Appendix.[author unknown] - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (S1):129-151.

Add more references