Eighteenth-Century Thought 1:123-49 (2003)

Authors
Jacqueline Broad
Monash University
Abstract
Against the backdrop of the English reception of Locke’s Essay, stands a little-known philosophical dispute between two seventeenth-century women writers: Mary Astell (1666-1731) and Damaris Cudworth Masham (1659-1708). On the basis of their brief but heated exchange, Astell and Masham are typically regarded as philosophical adversaries: Astell a disciple of the occasionalist John Norris, and Masham a devout Lockean. In this paper, I argue that although there are many respects in which Astell and Masham are radically opposed, the two women also have a surprising amount in common. Rather than interpret their ideas solely in relation to the ‘canonical’ philosophies of the time – Lockean empiricism and Malebranchean occasionalism – I examine the ways in which Astell and Masham are influenced by the metaphysical theories of the Cambridge Platonists, Ralph Cudworth and Henry More. On this basis, I argue that a remarkably similar theological approach underlies the metaphysical and feminist arguments of Astell and Masham.
Keywords Damaris Masham  Mary Astell
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Appendix.[author unknown] - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (s1):129-151.
Appendix.[author unknown] - 1993 - The Personalist Forum 9 (1):53-61.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Lady Damaris Masham.Sarah Hutton - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A Minimalist Account of Love.Getty L. Lustila - 2021 - In Rachel Fedock, Michael Kühler & T. Raja Rosenhagen (eds.), Love, Justice, and Autonomy: Philosophical Perspectives. pp. 61-78.
Mary Astell.M. Sowal - 2005 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Love of God and Love of Creatures: The Masham-Astell Debate.Catherine Wilson - 2004 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 21 (3):281 - 298.
Leibniz on Hobbes’s Materialism.Stewart Duncan - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (1):11-18.
A Serious Proposal to the Ladies.Mary Astell (ed.) - 2002 - Broadview Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-11-06

Total views
301 ( #32,331 of 2,461,451 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #37,990 of 2,461,451 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes