American Journal of Bioethics 8 (4):24 – 31 (2008)
AbstractPragmatism is a distinctive approach to clinical research ethics that can guide bioethicists and members of institutional review boards (IRBs) as they struggle to balance the competing values of promoting medical research and protecting human subjects participating in it. After defining our understanding of pragmatism in the setting of clinical research ethics, we show how a pragmatic approach can provide guidance not only for the day-to-day functioning of the IRB, but also for evaluation of policy standards, such as the one that addresses acceptable risks for healthy children in clinical research trials. We also show how pragmatic considerations might influence the debate about the use of deception in clinical research. Finally, we show how a pragmatic approach, by regarding the promotion of human research and the protection of human subjects as equally important values, helps to break down the false dichotomy between science and ethics in clinical research.
Similar books and articles
Rethinking the Ethics of Clinical Research: Widening the Lens.Alan Wertheimer - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Ethical and Regulatory Aspects of Clinical Research: Readings and Commentary.Ezekiel J. Emanuel (ed.) - 2003 - Johns Hopkins University Press.
The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics.Ezekiel J. Emanuel (ed.) - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
A Clinical Trials Manual From the Duke Clinical Research Institute: Lessons From a Horse Named Jim.Margaret B. Liu - 2010 - Wiley-Blackwell.
Using empirical data to inform the ethical evaluation of placebo controlled trials.Jeremy Sugarman - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):29-35.
Bench to bedside: Mapping the moral terrain of clinical research.Steven Joffe & Franklin G. Miller - 2008 - Hastings Center Report 38 (2):30-42.
Clinical Study Reflections: Another View: Commentary on: “Raising Suspicions with the Food and Drug Administration: Detecting Misconduct”.Patricia Spitzig - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):705-711.
End of Life Pediatric Research: What About the Ethics? [REVIEW]Danielle Laudy - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):87-91.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Use of Deception in Public Health Behavioral Intervention Trials: A Case Study of Three Online Alcohol Trials.Jim McCambridge, Kypros Kypri, Preben Bendtsen & John Porter - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (11):39-47.
IRB Decision-Making with Imperfect Knowledge: A Framework for Evidence-Based Research Ethics Review.Emily E. Anderson & James M. DuBois - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):951-969.
Instrumentalist analyses of the functions of ethics concept-principles: a proposal for synergetic empirical and conceptual enrichment.Eric Racine, M. Ariel Cascio, Marjorie Montreuil & Aline Bogossian - 2019 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 40 (4):253-278.
Pediatric Participation in Non-Therapeutic Research.Marilyn C. Morris - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (3):665-672.
Institutional review boards: A flawed system of risk management.Simon N. Whitney - 2016 - Research Ethics 12 (4):182-200.
References found in this work
The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action.John Dewey - 1960  - London: G. Allen & Unwin.
The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action.John Dewey - 1930 - Mind 39 (155):372-375.
The Quest for Certainty, a Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action.John Dewey - 1930 - Humana Mente 5 (19):448-451.