The Maximum Claims of Gauthier's Bargainers: Are the Fixed Social Inequalities Acceptable?

Dialogue 21 (3):411-429 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deciding how to decide.J. David Velleman - 1997 - In Garrett Cullity & Berys Nigel Gaut (eds.), Ethics and practical reason. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 29--52.
Two Gauthiers?Duncan MacIntosh - 1989 - Dialogue 28 (1):43-.
Acceptable Inequalities.E. Scrivens - 1989 - Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (3):160-161.
The social virtues: Two accounts. [REVIEW]S. Goldberg - 2009 - Acta Analytica 24 (4):237-248.
How Egalitarian is Rawls's Theory of Justice?Ian Hunt - 2010 - Philosophical Papers 39 (2):155-181.
Health equity and social justice.Fabienne Peter - 2001 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (2):159–170.
Davidson on value and objectivity.Hallvard Lillehammer - 2007 - Dialectica 61 (2):203–217.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-25

Downloads
5 (#1,533,504)

6 months
1 (#1,469,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Interpersonal comparisons of utility: Why and how they are and should be made.Peter J. Hammond - 1991 - In Jon Elster & John E. Roemer (eds.), Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being. Cambridge University Press. pp. 200--254.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references