A defense of utilitarian policy processes in corporate and public management

Journal of Business Ethics 4 (1):23 - 30 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The growing awareness that corporate and public policy forming processes are intensively utilitarian has provoked a variety of criticism. The procedural difficulties of utilitarianism are well known; less well known but potentially more devastating is a set of charges that utilitarian policy processes intrude upon important relationships and societal processes. This paper defends utilitarian methods against these charges.More specifically, two criticisms are singled out for examination. The first is the claim that utilitarian policy processes systematically discriminate against the rights of non-human life and suppress any feelings of sympathy or obligation humans might have for animals or plants. The second is the argument that utilitarianism ultimately circumvents considerations of process which are essential for the development of individual and societal identity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
61 (#257,838)

6 months
12 (#304,552)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

In Defense of a Utilitarian Business Ethic.Andrew Gustafson - 2013 - Business and Society Review 118 (3):325-360.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Foundations of the metaphysics of morals.Immanuel Kant - 2000 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press USA.
The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism.Monroe C. Beardsley - 1976 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 35 (2):229-231.
The function of reason.Alfred North Whitehead - 1929 - Boston,: Beacon Press.
Policy science: Analysis or ideology?Laurence H. Tribe - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 2 (1):66-110.

View all 6 references / Add more references