AI As a Moral Right-Holder

In Markus Dirk Dubber, Frank Pasquale & Sunit Das (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of Ai. Oxford Handbooks (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter evaluates whether AI systems are or will be rights-holders, explaining the conditions under which people should recognize AI systems as rights-holders. It develops a skeptical stance toward the idea that current forms of artificial intelligence are holders of moral rights, beginning with an articulation of one of the most prominent and most plausible theories of moral rights: the Interest Theory of rights. On the Interest Theory, AI systems will be rights-holders only if they have interests or a well-being. Current AI systems are not bearers of well-being, and so fail to meet the necessary condition for being rights-holders. This argument is robust against a range of different objections. However, the chapter also shows why difficulties in assessing whether future AI systems might have interests or be bearers of well-being—and so be rights-holders—raise difficult ethical challenges for certain developments in AI.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dead Persons as Legal Rights Holders.Ivana Tucak & Tomislav Nedić - 2022 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 42 (2):289-312.
The Moral Status of AI Entities.Joan Llorca Albareda, Paloma García & Francisco Lara - 2023 - In Francisco Lara & Jan Deckers (eds.), Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 59-83.
Group Agency and Artificial Intelligence.Christian List - 2021 - Philosophy and Technology (4):1-30.
Designing AI with Rights, Consciousness, Self-Respect, and Freedom.Eric Schwitzgebel & Mara Garza - 2023 - In Francisco Lara & Jan Deckers (eds.), Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 459-479.
The Unilateral Authority Theory of Punishment.Richard Child - 2024 - Law and Philosophy 43 (2):187-213.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-03

Downloads
3 (#1,733,497)

6 months
3 (#1,208,233)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

John Basl
Northeastern University
Joseph Bowen
Stockholm University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references