Hypatia 7 (3):197-207 (1992)

My response to the preceding commentaries draws on recent events such as the Thomas/Hill hearings to illustrate some of my central arguments in “Feminist Skepticism and the ‘Maleness’ of Philosophy.” I also attempt to clarify frequently misunderstood aspects of my use of gender as an analytical category, and discuss why, in my opinion, we should continue to care about the “maleness” of philosophy.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1527-2001.1992.tb00916.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,577
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Maleness of God.F. B. Julian - 1953 - Hibbert Journal 52:343.
""24 The" Maleness" of Reason.Genevieve Lloyd - 1998 - In Alcoff Linda (ed.), Epistemology: The Big Questions. Blackwell. pp. 387.
Gender and Other Categories.Linda Fisher - 1992 - Hypatia 7 (3):173 - 179.
Maleness: A'new'context in Spirituality.David Ranson - 2002 - The Australasian Catholic Record 79 (3):299.
The Masculine Mode.Peter Schwenger - 1979 - Critical Inquiry 5 (4):621-633.
" Tuskegee Revisited" Revisited.Thomas G. Benedek - 2002 - Hastings Center Report 32 (2):4.
Tuskegee Revisited Revisited-Reply.S. M. Reverby - 2002 - Hastings Center Report 32 (2):4-5.


Added to PP index

Total views
70 ( #167,619 of 2,533,598 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #389,998 of 2,533,598 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes