Reflections on Feminist Scepticism, The “Maleness” of Philosophy and Postmodernism

Hypatia 7 (3):166-172 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bordo is concerned with what she calls apostmodem “theoretics of heterogeneity” that questions the validity of historical and cultural analyses “along gender-tines.” It also challenges the validity of feminist analyses concerning the “maleness” of philosophy. Not surprisingly, this has precipitated debate between postmodernists and those alarmed by its implications for feminist work. At issue is the epistemological and political capacity of feminism to analyze social power and dominance through an analysis of gender.1.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Differences that matter: feminist theory and postmodernism.Sara Ahmed - 1998 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Essays in feminist ethics.Ina Praetorius - 1998 - Leuven, Belgium: Peeters.
Feminist Philosophy.Herta Nagl-Docekal - 2004 - Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
22 (#690,757)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Maureen Milligan
Marquette University (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Feminism/Postmodernism.Linda Nicholson - 1989 - Science and Society 56 (2):234-236.
Philosophy and Feminist Thinking.Jean Grimshaw - 1988 - Hypatia 3 (2):170-172.

View all 8 references / Add more references