It is fairly standard practice in introductory textbooks on symbolic logic to distinguish simple from compound state-ments. A well-known account of this distinction goes as follows: A simple statement is one which does not contain any

Logique Et Analyse 77:165 (1977)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Simple Theory of Counterfactuals.Terrance Tomkow - manuscript
Simple Logic.Daniel Bonevac - 1998 - Oxford and New York: Oup Usa.
Review: Max Black, The Analysis of a Simple Necessary Statement. [REVIEW]Everett J. Nelson - 1944 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 9 (1):27-28.
Compound and simple responses in paired-associate learning.Joseph L. Young & Robert L. Schiffer - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 91 (2):206.
Why the State Needs a Justification.Lester H. Hunt - unknown
On Kueker Simple Theories.Ziv Shami - 2005 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (1):216 - 222.
Indexical Beliefs and Communication: Against Stalnaker on Self‐Location.Clas Weber - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90 (3):640-663.
Logical consequence: A defense of Tarski.Greg Ray - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (6):617 - 677.
Simple Concepts.Pavel Materna - 2013 - Acta Analytica 28 (3):295-319.
A partial functions version of church's simple theory of types.William M. Farmer - 1990 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 55 (3):1269-1291.
Definability and definable groups in simple theories.Anand Pillay - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (3):788-796.
Simple and compound statements.A. Blum - 1977 - Logique Et Analyse 20 (77):165.
The Express Knowledge Account of Assertion.John Turri - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (1):37-45.
Definability in number fields.S. P. Tung - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (1):152-155.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-10

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A Version of the Frege ‐ Quine Argument.Alex Blum - 1988 - Dialectica 42 (4):307-312.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references