Misunderstandings of Epistemic Tit for Tat: Reply to John Woods

Journal of Philosophy 87 (7):369 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epistemic tit for tat.Michel J. Blais - 1987 - Journal of Philosophy 84 (7):363-375.
Epistemic Tit for Tat.Michel J. Blais - 1987 - Journal of Philosophy 84 (7):363.
The maladroitness of epistemic tit for tat.John Woods - 1989 - Journal of Philosophy 86 (6):324-331.
The Maladroitness of Epistemic Tit for Tat.John Woods - 1989 - Journal of Philosophy 86 (6):324.
The Ethics of Tit-for-Tat.Massimo Pigliucci - 2001 - Philosophy Now 33:28-29.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
11 (#351,772)

6 months
3 (#1,723,834)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Testimony: a primer.Martin Kusch & Peter Lipton - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (2):209-217.
Game Theory in Philosophy.Boudewijn de Bruin - 2005 - Topoi 24 (2):197-208.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references