Are heartbeat bills ethically defensible?

Bioethics 1 (2):219-220 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Heartbeat bills are laws prohibiting abortion in most circumstances once a fetal heartbeat can be detected, and are common in US states. They have been criticised as poorly designed and disingenuous. In this letter to the editor I examine these criticisms.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethically evaluating land art: Is it worth it?Sheila Lintott - 2007 - Ethics, Place and Environment 10 (3):263 – 277.
The Ethics of Pressure Groups.Peter Whawell - 1998 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 7 (3):178-181.
The ethics of pressure groups.Peter Whawell - 1998 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 7 (3):178–181.
Ethically compromised vaccines in Australia.Kerri Anne Brussen - 2012 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 17 (3):1.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-02

Downloads
46 (#339,736)

6 months
19 (#131,200)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bruce P. Blackshaw
University of Birmingham

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references